Trading spaces? Llama and gpt

These days you see a lot of examples of the "two way door" opensource. Some decisions you can easily come back from " two way door", and some you can't "one way door".

Facebook signals that they might be limiting their focus on publishing models and of course "open" ai. ( which doesnt open much of thr platform imho) had licensed there models in a new way.

I have been in the vacuume of fb open source before. Hive ws one of my first loves and fb did a decent effort to open source much in those days. Some was just throw over the fence (like scribe). Hive was supported for a while, but the entire cloudera, impala, spark , presto, drill debacle drove everyone in different directions.

So the question to ask: Is this the changing of the guards or a "one time deal"?

Elastic, redis, terraform, things dont always survive a license change. They might drive off the community by giving amazon a foothold to fork and split it to bits.

Llm models, these days i would argue are a a two way door. Afterall, deepseek can train one for 5 million that only has a shelf life of a few months. Not to say that " anyone" can do that, but a model with a special license seems not to be that sticky anymore.

Will we see models changing license every few months? Split licensing? Is the platform more consequential than the model?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For the love of Java

Large Language Models Termperature and relative performance

Guided Choice: Get only the answer you want with no fluff